Names: Love, Albert G. (Albert Gallatin), 1877- - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Names Love, Albert G. (Albert Gallatin), 1877-

Correspondence of Albert E. Truby, Jefferson Randolph Kean, and Philip Showalter Hench1951-1952 Box 65, Folder 4

Collection Context

Correspondence of Philip Showalter Hench concerning the preservation of Building Number One at Camp Lazear1951 Box 44, Folder 1

Collection Context

Correspondence of Philip Showalter Hench with George E. Armstrong, Albert G. Love, Joseph F. Siler, Paul H. Streit, and Albert E. Truby concerning the memorialization of Camp Lazear, preservation of Building Number One, and the dedicatory ceremonies for the memorial park at the site1952 Box 45, Folder 6

Collection Context

Letter from Albert G. Love to Bessie M. Griswold December 20, 1951 Box 43, Folder 84

Collection Context

Letter from Albert G. Love to Cornelia Knox Kean November 14, 1952 Box 65, Folder 4

Collection Context

Letter from Albert G. Love to Philip Showalter HenchApril 4, 1952 Box 44, Folder 22

Collection Context

Letter from Albert G. Love to Philip Showalter Hench December 21, 1951 Box 43, Folder 84

Collection Context

Letter from Albert G. Love to Philip Showalter Hench June 19, 1953 Box 46, Folder 15

Collection Context

Letter from Albert G. Love to Philip Showalter Hench June 5, 1954 Box 47, Folder 16

Collection Context

Letter from Albert G. Love to Philip Showalter Hench November 26, 1951 Box 44, Folder 1

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.