Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects Resolutions--Virginia--Richmond. Remove constraint Subjects: Resolutions--Virginia--Richmond.

Search Results

Richmond (Va.) Court Records, 1805-1893

Abstract Or Scope

Richmond (Va.) Court Records, 1805-1893. The collection contains various documents removed from Richmond court records. The records include a letter from the chancery cause Leach vs. Leach, 1822; a letter pertaining to the court case Brown vs. Chiles and Curtis, 1826; a resolution from the President and Directors of the James River and Kanawha Company, 1841, used as an exhibit in the case James River and Kanawha Company vs. Sims; a letter regarding publication of the sale of Middleton Mills, 1846; a letter regarding suits in which George Potter's Estate is interested, 1849; a letter pertaining to the court case Clopton's Executor vs. Jordan, 1851; a statement from the Hanover County clerk regarding the qualification of Louisa E. Carter as Executor of George Carter, 1884; and a postcard pertaining to the cause Bowles vs. Wiltshire, etc., 1888. Other surnames in the records are Addison, Anderson, Berkeley, Branch, Brooks, Brown, Caperton, Chiles, Clarke, Cocke, Cooke, Crouch, Crump, Deane, Duval, Ellington, Faris, Gaines, Galt, Gilliam, Goodman, Harrison, Hovey, Hudson, Jackson, Jeter, Keane, King, Leake, Leitch, Ludlam, McCraw, Myers, Perkins, Peyton, Potter, Randall, Stone, Stribling, Thompson, Triplett, Tucker, Tutwiler, Whitmore, and Williams.

1 result

Richmond (Va.) Court Records, 1805-1893

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.