Search Results
Kanawha County (W. Va.) Court Records and Miscellaneous Papers 274.85 Linear Feet Summary: 274 ft. 10 in. (541 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 records carton, 15 in.); (2 ledgers, 1.5 in.); (2 oversize folders, 4 items); (2 folders, .5 in.); (290 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each); (83 reels of microfilm, .75 in. each); (1 small flat storage box, 3 in.); (1 record storage box, 3.5 in.)
Lewis County Archives 117.29 Linear Feet Summary: 117 ft. 3 1/2 in. (175 document cases, 5 in. each); (11 records cartons, 15 in. each); (9 ledgers, 7 in.); (206 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each)
Marion County Circuit Court Trial Docket 0.57 Linear Feet Summary: 6 3/4 in. (1 folder, 18 items); (1 unboxed ledger, 1 1/2 in.); (3 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each)
Marshall County Archives 19.38 Linear Feet Summary: 19 ft. 4 1/2 in. (41 document cases, 5 in. each); (3 ledgers, 6 1/2 in.); (12 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each)
Mary McKendree Johnson, Collector, Papers 5.8 Linear Feet Summary: 5 ft. 10 in. (14 document cases, 5 in. each)
Mason County Archives 106.08 Linear Feet Summary: 106 ft. 1 in. (192 document cases, 5 in. each); (19 ledgers, 3 ft. 4 in.); (156 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each)
Monongalia County Archives 0.4 Linear Feet Summary: 5 in. (1 document case)
Monongalia County (W. Va.) Court Records and Miscellaneous Papers 273.54 Linear Feet (343 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 records carton, 15 in.); (1 flat storage box, 3 in.); (83 record books, 17 ft. 7 in.); (175 flat boxes (nonstandard), 4 in. each); (340 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each); (58 reels of microfilm, 0.75 in. each)
Monroe County Archives 65.08 Linear Feet Summary: 65 ft. 1 in. (96 document cases, 5 in. each); (3 records cartons, 15 in. each); (1 records carton, 17 in.); (19 ledgers, 2 ft. 5 in.); (120 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each)
Content Warning
ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.
Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.
Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.