Search

Start Over Date range 1981 Subjects Aerial photographs

Abraham Anson papers 12.5 Linear Feet 31 boxes

Anson, Abraham
The collection includes aerial photographs, publications, newspapers, magazines, correspondence, notebooks, color slides, glass slides, and maps.
  1. George Mason University

Arthur Arundel papers 0.25 Linear Feet 1 box

Arundel, Arthur M.
The Arthur Arundel papers collection includes correspondence, proposals, status reports and other documents documenting Arthur Arundel's service on the George Mason University Advisory Board and the Board of Visitors. Documents in this collection are photocopies of the orginals.
  1. George Mason University

Jack Rottier photograph collection 3.5 Linear Feet 10 boxes

Rottier, John M. (Jack), 1910-1988
This collection contains 10 boxes of slides, negatives, and prints of photographs taken by National Park Service photographer Jack Rottier, as well as other National Park photographers. Numbering around 2,500 total, the photographs in this collection document politics, culture, and urban beautification in and around Washington, D.C. during the 1960s and 1970s. Subjects include United States presidents from Eisenhower to Ford, Lady Bird Johnson, the Washington Senators baseball team, the National Mall, and various Potomac-region landmarks and parks.
  1. George Mason University

William and Verdie Lindamood papers 0.33 cubic feet 4 folders, 1 flat file

Lindamood, William E. (William Edward), 1913-1998
Papers comprising correspondence, cards, church records, and genealogical notes from the estate of Bill and Verdie Lindamood, Broadway, Virginia.
  1. James Madison University

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.