Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Places Louisa County (Va.) Remove constraint Places: Louisa County (Va.)

Search Results

Joseph Coats, Jr., Reward Announcement,

0.1 Cubic Feet 1 folder
Abstract Or Scope
The collection consists of a handwritten announcement regarding an enslaved person that ran away from the Cuckooville neighborhood of Louisa County, Virginia. Dated August 3, 1840, this letter describes in detail -- including physical characteristics and temperament -- the escaped 18-year-old named Sam. The author of this document, Joseph Coats Jr., presumably Sam's enslaver, offers a ten dollar reward for his capture.
1 result

Joseph Coats, Jr., Reward Announcement, 0.1 Cubic Feet 1 folder

W. B. Gilmer Papers

0.3 Cubic Feet 1 box
Abstract Or Scope
The W. B. Gilmer Papers document the Defenders of State Sovereignty and Individual Liberties from 1954-1962. The organization was formed to prevent integration in Virginia's public schools. The collection includes broadsides, circulars, letters, certificate of incorporation, newsletters and memos, and newspaper clippings. Please note: This collection contains racist ideology and language that may be upsetting to researchers.
1 result

W. B. Gilmer Papers 0.3 Cubic Feet 1 box

William Q. Thomson Day Book

0.1 Cubic Feet 1 folder
Abstract Or Scope
This collection is a ledger or day book used by enslaver and farmer William Q. Thomson of Happy Valley, Louisa County, Virginia, dated 1845-1854, 1882-1891. The book includes debts to associates, purchases, and bills paid, including for family members. Some of the early entries are for hiring the labor of enslaved people. Thomson (ca. 1825-1891) enslaved at least 22 people, inlcuding Georgeanna and her baby Peter Dudley.
1 result

William Q. Thomson Day Book 0.1 Cubic Feet 1 folder

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.