Search

Start Over Names Wells, Lyle M. Places Mannington District.
West Virginia and Regional History Center

Marion County, Coal Lick School, History, 1984/1985

0.35 Linear Feet Summary: 4 1/4 in. (1 document case, 2 1/2 in.); (1 reel of microfilm, 1.75 in.)
A manuscript volume of a study of Coal Lick School, Marion County, WV, 1920-1922. The work was prepared in 1984-1985 by 20 survivors of the one room school which is located in the Mannington District. The study was initiated by Margery McIntire Norton, a student, and the West Augusta Historical Society. The manuscript includes a historical and descriptive discussion of the school; biographical information regarding Berlin B. Chapman, teacher of Coal Lick Schoolhouse, 1920-1922; original and copies of correspondence to and from Berlin B. Chapman; original and copies of various newspaper articles that relate to Coal Lick School.
1 result

Marion County, Coal Lick School, History, 1984/1985 0.35 Linear Feet Summary: 4 1/4 in. (1 document case, 2 1/2 in.); (1 reel of microfilm, 1.75 in.)

Coal Lick School (Marion County, W. Va.)
A manuscript volume of a study of Coal Lick School, Marion County, WV, 1920-1922. The work was prepared in 1984-1985 by 20 survivors of the one room school which is located in the Mannington District. The study was initiated by Margery McIntire Norton, a student, and the West Augusta Historical Society. The manuscript includes a historical and descriptive discussion of the school; biographical information regarding Berlin B. Chapman, teacher of Coal Lick Schoolhouse, 1920-1922; original and copies of correspondence to and from Berlin B. Chapman; original and copies of various newspaper articles that relate to Coal Lick School.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.

Limit your search