Collections

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Names Young, Robert Remove constraint Names: Young, Robert Level Collection Remove constraint Level: Collection

Search Results

Daniel Boardman Papers

0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1/4 in. (1 folder)
Abstract Or Scope

Six letters to Boardman at Broadway, New York City, regarding ejectment suits and the sale of his land along French and Hacker creeks, Lewis Co., (W)Va. Three letters are written by James Pindall, Congressman, and Boardman's counsel, from Washington City and Clarksburg, (W )Va. Other correspondents are William Hacker, Job Thayer, and Robert Young, of French Creek settlement, a New Englander who was ejected from I Boardman's land, and who pleads the case for his countryman, who "will cultivate the mountains," Whereas "Virginians will not settle on it as they want Bottom Land."

1 result

Daniel Boardman Papers 0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1/4 in. (1 folder)

Robert Young Family Genealogy

0.4 Linear Feet Summary: 5 in. (1 document case)
Abstract Or Scope
A notebook of genealogical forms compiled by the donor tracing the descent of the Robert Young & Lydia Gould family who settled at French Creek, Upshur County. Some mention is made of military service, occupation, and character of some of the individuals. Especially important is mention of individuals who served in the Civil War and World War I.
1 result

Robert Young Family Genealogy 0.4 Linear Feet Summary: 5 in. (1 document case)

Robert Young, Resident of Greenbrier County, Papers

0.01 Linear Feet 1/4 in. (1 folder)
Abstract Or Scope
Papers of Robert Young of Lewisburg, Greenbrier County. Includes original deeds, store billings, correspondence, receipts, notes of obligation, etc.
1 result

Robert Young, Resident of Greenbrier County, Papers 0.01 Linear Feet 1/4 in. (1 folder)

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.