Collections

Start Over Names Logan family Level Collection
West Virginia and Regional History Center

Clement Ross Jones (1871-1939) Papers, 1934/1957

1.9 Linear Feet Summary: 1 ft. 11 in. (4 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 small flat storage box, 3 in.)

Collection contains histories of the Hardin, Iglehart, Kincheloe, Waters, Wickliffe, and allied families such as Neal, Logan, Foley, Lewis, Peadro, Phelps, Monroe, Dils, McQuilkin, and others. Collection also includes Jones' correspondence relating to the above genealogies and some newspaper clippings.

1 result

Clement Ross Jones (1871-1939) Papers, 1934/1957 1.9 Linear Feet Summary: 1 ft. 11 in. (4 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 small flat storage box, 3 in.)

Jones, Clement Ross (1871-1939)

Collection contains histories of the Hardin, Iglehart, Kincheloe, Waters, Wickliffe, and allied families such as Neal, Logan, Foley, Lewis, Peadro, Phelps, Monroe, Dils, McQuilkin, and others. Collection also includes Jones' correspondence relating to the above genealogies and some newspaper clippings.

James Madison University

Garber and Logan family papers, 1846/1949

0.99 cubic feet 3 boxes
The Garber and Logan Family Papers, 1846-1949, comprise personal receipts of Joseph Garber, genealogy of the Garber Family, and photographs likely taken by John and Emma Logan.
1 result

Garber and Logan family papers, 1846/1949 0.99 cubic feet 3 boxes

Garber family
The Garber and Logan Family Papers, 1846-1949, comprise personal receipts of Joseph Garber, genealogy of the Garber Family, and photographs likely taken by John and Emma Logan.
Albemarle Charlottesville Historical Society

Papers of James Logan, 1927-1934

1 folder (20 items)
1 result

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.