Search Results
Alexander Haight family collection 7 Linear Feet 7 boxes, 1 map case
Civil War Collection 1.5 Linear Feet
Ellison Family Papers 3.3 Linear Feet Summary: 3 ft. 4 in. (8 document cases, 5 in. each)
Emily Gray Shreve Papers 0.4 Linear Feet 6 1/2 in. (1 document case, 5 in.)
Frances Packette Todd Papers 20.67 Linear Feet Summary: 20 ft. 8 in. (44 document cases, 5 in. each); (4 document cases, 2 1/2 in. each); (1 small flat storage box, 3 in.); (3 large flat storage boxes, 3 in. each); (1 large box, 6 in.)
George W. Hadley, Ohio Volunteer Infantry, Papers 0.01 Linear Feet 1 folder
Jack Sandy Anderson, Compiler, Historical Records regarding West Virginia 0.3 Linear Feet 3 1/2 in. (1 document case, 2 1/2 in.); (2 folders, 3/4 in.); (2 oversize folders, 1/4 in. total)
Jim Comstock, Newspaper Editor and Collector, Papers 65.25 Linear Feet Summary: 65 ft. 3 1/4 in. (102 document cases, 5 in. each); (7 document cases, 2 1/2 in. each); (5 record cartons, 15 in. each); (2 record cartons, 17 in. each); (6 large flat storage boxes, 1 1/2 in. each); (2 flat storage boxes, 3 in. each); (8 large flat storage boxes, 3 in. each); (8 flat storage boxes, 3 1/2 in. each); (11 medium flat storage boxes, 3 1/2 in. each); (10 large flat storage boxes, 3 1/2 in. each); (1 large flat storage box, 5 in.); (6 oversize folders, 1 1/4 in. total)
J. Robert Rice, Collector, Civil War Diary of Joshua Rice .25 Linear Feet 2 1/2 in. (1 document case) 9.79 Gigabytes 31 files, formats include .tif and .pdf
Content Warning
ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.
Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.
Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.