Search

Start Over Date range 1955 Places Prince William County (Va.)
George Mason University

Henry H. Douglas papers

1.25 Linear Feet 4 boxes
Notes, articles, correspondence and other materials regarding information on Prince William County, Virginia and surrounding areas.
1 result

Henry H. Douglas papers 1.25 Linear Feet 4 boxes

Douglas, Henry H., 1903-1987
Notes, articles, correspondence and other materials regarding information on Prince William County, Virginia and surrounding areas.
George Mason University

Prince William County historic newspapers collection

3 Linear Feet 9 boxes
Prince William County newspapers dating from 1851 to 1992.
1 result
University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

Robert C. Fitzgerald papers

9.7 Cubic Feet 24 archival boxes

These papers pertain to Robert C. Fitzgerald's (Law 1943) practice as an attorney counseling counties and cities in Virginia on issues of annexation and intergovernmental affairs. The most important and complete file is Pittsylvania County - City of Danville, a case that dealt with the annexation petition of Danville, VA, and the negotiations between the city of Danville and the county of Pittsylvania in which Fitzgerald served as legal counsel for the county's board of supervisors.

1 result

Robert C. Fitzgerald papers 9.7 Cubic Feet 24 archival boxes

Fitzgerald, Robert Clayton, 1921-2001

These papers pertain to Robert C. Fitzgerald's (Law 1943) practice as an attorney counseling counties and cities in Virginia on issues of annexation and intergovernmental affairs. The most important and complete file is Pittsylvania County - City of Danville, a case that dealt with the annexation petition of Danville, VA, and the negotiations between the city of Danville and the county of Pittsylvania in which Fitzgerald served as legal counsel for the county's board of supervisors.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.