Search Results
Brown and Parsons Families Papers 0.4 Linear Feet Summary: 5 in. (2 documents cases, 2 1/2 in. each)
Charles Carpenter, Collector, Papers 0.2 Linear Feet Summary: 2 in. (2 folders)
Coal Mining Disaster Reports Collection 1.7 Linear Feet Summary: 1 ft. 8 in. (1 record carton, 15 in.); (1 document case, 5 in.)
Cutright Family Genealogy Collection 0.4 Linear Feet Summary: 5 in. (1 document case)
Enon Baptist Church, Ledgers 0.4 Linear Feet Summary: 5 in. (1 document case)
Gary Weiner, Collector, Clarksburg Historical Records 16.8 Linear Feet 16 ft. 10 in. (8 record cartons, 15 in. each); (5 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 document case, 2 1/2 in.); (2 small flat storage boxes, 3 in. each); (6 flat storage boxes, 3 in.); (1 medium flat storage box, 5 in.); (2 large flat storage boxes, 5 in.); (2 large flat storage boxes, 3 1/2 in.); (1 large flat storage box, 2 in.); (1 large flat storage box, 3 in.); (3 loose framed items, 3 1/2 in. total) 0.0004 Gigabytes 4 files, .docx and .rtf formats
Gideon D. Camden (1805-1891) Papers 35.7 Linear Feet Summary: 35 ft. 7 1/2 in. (84 document cases, 5 in. each); (2 document cases, 2 1/2 in. each); (1 large flat storage box, 5 in.)
Goff Family of Harrison County, West Virginia Papers 2.7 Linear Feet Summary: 2 ft. 7 3/4 in. (2 record cartons, 15 in. each); (1 oversize folder, 1/4 in.); (1 artifact box, 1 1/2 in.)
Harglo Glass Company Records 2.6 Linear Feet Summary: 2 ft. 7 in. (1 records carton, 15 in.); (1 records carton, 17 in.)
Content Warning
ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.
Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.
Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.