Search Results
Greenbrier County Accounting Records 0.25 Linear Feet Summary: 3 in. (1 small flat storage box, 3 in.)
Greenbrier County, West Virginia Miscellaneous Papers 0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 15 items (1 folder)
H. C. and Virginia R. Cabell, Papers of Greenbrier County Residents 0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 13 items (1 folder)
Henry Ruffner (1790-1861) and William Henry (1824-1908) Papers 0.15 Linear Feet Summary: 1 3/4 in. (1 reel of microfilm (310 items), 1.75 in.)
James Kincaid Papers 0.1 Linear Feet Summary: 1 in.
Lawrence A. Lang, Collector, West Virginia Land Records 1.25 Linear Feet 1 ft. 3 in. (3 document cases, 5 in. each)
Long/Trail Southeastern West Virginia Historical Records 117.02 Linear Feet 29 document case, 5 in. each; 20 document cases, 2.5 in. each; 78 record cartons, 15 in. each; 3 small flat storage boxes, 1.5 in. each; 1 small flat storage box, 3 in.; 4 large flat storage boxes, 1.5 in. each; 4 large flat storage boxes, 3 in. each; 1 card file box, 4.5 in.; 1 square roll tube, 3 in.; 1 square roll tube, 4 in.; 1 oversize folder, 2 in.; 1 framed item, 0.25 in.; 1 oversize photograph 38.2 Gigabytes 14,700 files, formats primarily include .tif, .jpg, .doc
Mann-Hutchinson Family Correspondence 3.83 Linear Feet 2 document cases, 5 in. each; 2 record cartons, 15 in. each; 1 flat storage box, 4 in.; 1 wrapped ledger, 2 in.
Michael Relihan, Personal and Family Papers of a Greenbrier County Resident 0.7 Linear Feet 8 in. (1 document case, 5 in.); (1 flat storage box, 3 in.)
Content Warning
ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.
Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.
Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.