Search

Start Over Date range 1719 Places Bath County (Va.)
West Virginia and Regional History Center

Terrill-Porterfield Families, Papers regarding the Civil War and Other Material

0.56 Linear Feet Summary: 6.75 in. (2 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each); (15 DVDs in index card box, 3 in.); (5 items in 1 folder, 0.25 in.) 55.1 Gigabytes 723 .tif files
Digital and microfilm copies of papers of the Terrill family of Hot Springs, Bath County, Virginia, a family divided by conflicting sympathies during the American Civil War; and papers of the Porterfield family, featuring primarily those of George A. Porterfield, who married Emily Cordelia Terrill, and who commanded a Confederate force that was defeated at Philippi in western Virginia on June 3, 1861 in what became known as the "Philippi Races." There is an addendum of original copies of five William Henry Terrill letters dating from the Civil War. See scope and content note for details.
1 result

Terrill-Porterfield Families, Papers regarding the Civil War and Other Material 0.56 Linear Feet Summary: 6.75 in. (2 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each); (15 DVDs in index card box, 3 in.); (5 items in 1 folder, 0.25 in.) 55.1 Gigabytes 723 .tif files

Terrill family
Digital and microfilm copies of papers of the Terrill family of Hot Springs, Bath County, Virginia, a family divided by conflicting sympathies during the American Civil War; and papers of the Porterfield family, featuring primarily those of George A. Porterfield, who married Emily Cordelia Terrill, and who commanded a Confederate force that was defeated at Philippi in western Virginia on June 3, 1861 in what became known as the "Philippi Races." There is an addendum of original copies of five William Henry Terrill letters dating from the Civil War. See scope and content note for details.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.