Search

Start Over Creator H. W. Symonds
University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.

Papers of the Quinby Family 1759(1800-1898)1968

The Quinby Family Papers consists of ca. 1300 items (7 Hollinger boxes and one oversize folder, 2.8 linear shelf feet, 1759(1800-1898)1968, papers of the Upshur, Teackle, Quinby, and other related families of the Eastern Shores of Maryland and Virginia, specifically Somerset County, Maryland, and Accomack and Northampton counties, Virginia. The collection includes correspondence, legal and finanical papers, a letterbook, ledgers and journals, class notebooks, commonplace books, genealogical information, prayerbooks, and memorandum books. The bulk of the collection consists of correspondence of Elizabeth (Upshur) Teackle, Littleton Dennis Teackle, Elizabeth Anne Upshur (Teackle) Quinby, Aaron Balderston Quinby, and Upshur Balderston Quinby with friends, family, and business associates.

1 result

Papers of the Quinby Family 1759(1800-1898)1968

H. W. Symonds

The Quinby Family Papers consists of ca. 1300 items (7 Hollinger boxes and one oversize folder, 2.8 linear shelf feet, 1759(1800-1898)1968, papers of the Upshur, Teackle, Quinby, and other related families of the Eastern Shores of Maryland and Virginia, specifically Somerset County, Maryland, and Accomack and Northampton counties, Virginia. The collection includes correspondence, legal and finanical papers, a letterbook, ledgers and journals, class notebooks, commonplace books, genealogical information, prayerbooks, and memorandum books. The bulk of the collection consists of correspondence of Elizabeth (Upshur) Teackle, Littleton Dennis Teackle, Elizabeth Anne Upshur (Teackle) Quinby, Aaron Balderston Quinby, and Upshur Balderston Quinby with friends, family, and business associates.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.

Limit your search