Search

Start Over Date range 1919 Creator Geological Survey (U.S.)
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

State of Alabama and Part of Georgia Coal Fields and Producing Districts

0.1 Cubic Feet 25 x 17 in.
Map shows coal fields and producing districts in Alabama and part of Georgia.
1 result
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

State of Indiana Coal Fields and Producing Districts

0.1 Cubic Feet 20 x 15 in.
Map shows coal fields and producing districts in Indiana.
1 result
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

State of Kentucky Coal Fields and Producing Districts

0.1 Cubic Feet 15 x 29 in.
Map shows coal fields and producing districts in Kentucky.
1 result
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

State of Ohio Coal Fields and Producing Districts

0.1 Cubic Feet 19 x 17 in.
Map shows coal fields and producing districts in Ohio.
1 result
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

State of Pennsylvania Coal Fields and Producing Districts

0.1 Cubic Feet 14 x 25 in.
Map shows coal fields and producing districts in Pennsylvania.
1 result
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

State of Tennessee Coal Fields and Producing Districts

0.1 Cubic Feet 10 x 34 in.
Map shows coal fields and producing districts in the state of Tennessee.
1 result
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

State of West Virginia and Part of Maryland Coal Fields and Producing Districts

0.1 Cubic Feet 18 x 22 in.
Map shows coal fields and producing districts in West Virginia and part of Maryland.
1 result
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

[Topographical Maps of Virginia] (52 maps)

0.1 Cubic Feet 21.5 x 16.5 - 33 x 20 in. (52 maps)
A collection of topographic maps separated from the J. Ambler Johnston Papers (Ms1974-012). The set is comprised of 52 individually titled maps, arranged in alphabetical order, each map (with the exception of the Christiansburg map, which may not be part of the original set) bearing a penciled-in number that coincides with its sequence in the alphabetical arrangement. The maps represent editions dating between 1891 and 1966, referring to surveys performed between 1883 and 1966. Missing are maps from an area between Floyd and Norfolk, along the North Carolina border. It is possible that other maps are missing as well. The reverse of each map contains information about topographic maps, as well as symbols used in the maps. The map for Norfolk is twice the size of the rest of the maps.
1 result

[Topographical Maps of Virginia] (52 maps) 0.1 Cubic Feet 21.5 x 16.5 - 33 x 20 in. (52 maps)

Geological Survey (U.S.)
A collection of topographic maps separated from the J. Ambler Johnston Papers (Ms1974-012). The set is comprised of 52 individually titled maps, arranged in alphabetical order, each map (with the exception of the Christiansburg map, which may not be part of the original set) bearing a penciled-in number that coincides with its sequence in the alphabetical arrangement. The maps represent editions dating between 1891 and 1966, referring to surveys performed between 1883 and 1966. Missing are maps from an area between Floyd and Norfolk, along the North Carolina border. It is possible that other maps are missing as well. The reverse of each map contains information about topographic maps, as well as symbols used in the maps. The map for Norfolk is twice the size of the rest of the maps.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.