Collection: W. Jett Lauck papers - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection W. Jett Lauck papers

Anthracite Cases and Conferences (1933-1945)

Collection Context

Anthracite Case - Statement of Lewis as to Secretary Ickes' status in the coal industry 1 folder(s) Box 199, Folder 20

Collection Context

Anthracite Coal – An Act to Protect the Public Interest by Preventing the Cessation of Anthracite Coal Mining 1 folder(s) Box 258, Folder 1

Collection Context

Anthracite Coal – Banker Railroad Combinations 1 folder(s) Box 258, Folder 2

Collection Context

Anthracite Coal Case of 1920 - Admissibility of Financial Data and Other Evidence 1 folder(s) Box 170, Folder 20

Collection Context

Anthracite Coal Case of 1920 - Analytical and Topical Index to Proceedings 1 folder(s) Box 170, Folder 21

Collection Context

Anthracite Coal Case of 1920 - Anthracite Mine Workers Forms and Surveys 1 folder(s) Box 170, Folder 23

Collection Context

Anthracite Coal Case of 1920 - Argument as to Jurisdiction of the Commission - Drafts 1 folder(s) Box 170, Folder 24

Collection Context

Anthracite Coal Case of 1920 - Award of the Anthracite Coal Strike Commission 1 folder(s) Box 170, Folder 25

This includes the "Report, Findings and Award of the United States Anthracite Coal Commission of 1920."

Collection Context

Anthracite Coal Case of 1920 - Chris Golden, President, District 9, United Mine Workers Opening and Closing Statements 1 folder(s) Box 171, Folder 2

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.