Collection: Tucker-Coleman papers - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Tucker-Coleman papers

A. Ferguson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Nathaniel Beverley Tucker, Williamsburg, Virginia Box 48, Folder 9

Package for Tucker left with him. Was overlooked.

Collection Context

Affidavit Box 13 (legal), Folder 5

Affidavit

Collection Context

A.G. Harrison, Fulton, Missouri, to Nathaniel Beverley Tucker Box 44, Folder 7

Away because of duties as Visitor to West Point. State politics.

Collection Context

Agreement between St. George Tucker and Samuel Ship Box 75, Folder 4

Agreement made on behalf of Alexander Campbell which concerns the lease and improvement of property on Campbell's Wharf.

Collection Context

Agreement by St. George Tucker by his attorney Creed Taylor for his land and 34 enslaved individuals in Cumberland County, Virginia to take £3,000 in three payments. Box 21, Folder 3

Tucker has only a life interest and then they would go to his children and the other half to John Randolph of Roanoke.

Collection Context

Agreement for Abraham Lockett to Pay Bond to Williams Box 11 (legal), Folder 9

Collection Context

Agreement (unexecuted) for Jacob Kinney to execute a bond and secure it with property approved by Tucker or John Coalter Box 21, Folder 3

Involves shares in the Bank of Virginia

Collection Context

Agreement (unexecuted) of Henry Skipwith regardingthe trust for Evelina Louisa Barlie Skipwith Box 21, Folder 3

Collection Context

Agreement with Peter O'Neill for Repairing Campbell's Wharf Box 76, Folder 13

Signed by Peter O'Neill, St. George Tucker, William Babbington, and Cary Barraud.

Collection Context

A. Harrison, Dumfries to St. George Tucker, Williamsburg Box 22, Folder 10

Letter of introduction for Mr. Little, John, son of Methodist preacher, who wishes to attend Tucker's law lectures. Tucker's friend Mr. Brent is a candidate for election to the Assembly and to Congress.

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.