Search

Start Over Collection Scott Donaldson Papers

Notes by Scott Donaldson of interviews conducted by Roy Winnick Box Series 2, Box 1, Folder 37

Scope and Contents of John Duke (26 October 1980), Paul Brooks (ca. October 1979), Mrs. William Scott ("Lydie") Keith, Sr. (26 October 1980), Keyes Metcalf (3 December 1981), Walter T. Fisher (15 November 1982), Mrs. Ronald H. (Anne) MacDonald (18March 1980), McGeorge Bundy (21 March 1980), Mrs. Cass ("Jane") Canfield (15 April 1980), Dwight MacDonald (15 April 1980), Mrs. Mark ("Dorothy") Van Doren (29 April 1980), Pat Hingle (May 1980) and Phillip and Mabel Reed (7 September 1980). Subjects include J. B., Van Doren, Fortune, World War II, and Harvard/ Law. (62 items)

  1. College of William and Mary
  2. Scott Donaldson Papers
  3. Series 2: Mss. Acc. 1992.37 Addition
  4. Box 1

Notes from interviews conducted by Scott Donaldson Box Series 2, Box 1, Folder 23

for his biography of Archibald MacLeish (includes phone interviews); includes interviews with Roderick MacLeish, Eugene McCarthy, Frank Snowden Hopkins, Mimi Grimm (daughter of Archibald), and William H. and Elizabeth MacLeish; interviews date from January 8, 1989 until June 11, 1990. (32 items)

  1. College of William and Mary
  2. Scott Donaldson Papers
  3. Series 2: Mss. Acc. 1992.37 Addition
  4. Box 1

Notes from interviews with Archibald MacLeish Box Series 2, Box 1, Folder 27

on September 13, 1972 and September 23, 1972, conducted by Denis Brian; notes on a conversation with Bill Bundy, his wife Mary (Acheson) Bundy, and their son Michael, on February 4, 1979; notes on a call from Barbara Tuchman on November 8, 1981; and interview of Archibald MacLeish by son William. (5 items)

  1. College of William and Mary
  2. Scott Donaldson Papers
  3. Series 2: Mss. Acc. 1992.37 Addition
  4. Box 1

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.

Limit your search