Collection: Monroe Leigh papers - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Monroe Leigh papers

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Copy of The Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon and others MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 7

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: "Developments in International Criminal Law: Foreword" by David J. Scheffer, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, pp.1 - 22 MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 18

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Draft of "Editorial Comment: The United States and the Statute of Rome" MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 16

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Editorial Comment by Jonathan I. Charney "International Criminal Law and the Role of Domestic Courts" MSS 04-2, Box 34

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: "Editorial Comment: Progress in International Criminal Law?" by Jonathan Charney, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, pp. 452-464 MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 17

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Email from aascher@attglobal.net to Monroe Leigh attaching edited editorial MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 5

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Email from Jonathan Charney to Monroe Leigh, copy to michael.reisman@yale.edu and AJIL re: MM171 - Editorial Comment MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 11

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Email from Jonathan Charney to Monroe Leigh copy to michael.reisman@yale.edu re: MM171 - Editorial Comment MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 13

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Email from Leigh Moore to AJIL@law.vanderbilt.edu and michael.resiman@yale.edu re: Editorial Comment, MSS 04-2, Box 35, Folder 1

Collection Context

AJIL - Editorial Comment: Email from michael.reisman@yale.edu to Monroe Leigh, copy to Jonathan Charney and AJIL re: Editorial -- AJIL MM171 MSS 04-2, Box 34, Folder 12

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.