Collection: Monroe Leigh papers - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Monroe Leigh papers

Letter from Bartram S. Brown to Monroe Leigh requesting comments MSS 04-2, Box 35, Folder 19

Enclosing articles on ICC and humanitarian intervention

Collection Context

Letter from Monroe Leigh to Professor Bartram Brown re: articles MSS 04-2, Box 35, Folder 18

Collection Context

Letter from Monroe Leigh to Professor Ted Meron forwarding draft of constitutional memo MSS 04-2, Box 35, Folder 17

Collection Context

Letters to Ecexutive Branch: Fax to Mark Ginsberg from Monroe Leigh re: ICC MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 2

Collection Context

Letters to Editors: Submissions for "Toward an International Criminal Court" by Monroe Leigh MSS 04-2, Box 3, Folder 10

1. to Washington Post, 2. to NYTimes (with penciled edits), 3. to Wall Street Journal

Collection Context

Letters to Executive Branch: Email from Ambassador Marc Ginsberg to Monroe Leigh re: Gore ,amp, the ICC MSS 04-2, Box 1, Folder 27

Collection Context

Letters to Executive Branch: Fax cover and confirmation to John Washburn MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 3

No indication of what document was forwarded

Collection Context

Letters to Executive Branch: Fax from David Stoelting to Monroe Leigh forwarding Australian proposal for ICC Rules of Procedure and Evidence MSS 04-2, Box 1, Folder 25

Collection Context

Letters to Executive Branch: Fax from David Stoelting to Monroe Leigh forwarding letter from Michael A. Cooper to Samuel Burger MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 4

Collection Context

Letters to Executive Branch: Fax from Rona R. Mears to Monroe Leigh forwarding email from David Stoelting on ICC MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 1

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.