Collection: Monroe Leigh papers - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Monroe Leigh papers

Legal Articles: Draft of "High Crimes and Misconceptions: The ICC and Non-Party States" by Madeline Morris MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 14

Collection Context

Legal Articles: Draft "The ICC's New Legal Landscape: The Need to Expand the United States Domestic Jurisdiction to Prosecute Genocide, War Crimes, and Crimes Against Humanity" by Douglass Cassel for Fordham International Law Journal MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 17

Collection Context

Legal Articles: Email from Bruce Broomhall to Monroe Leigh re: Diane's memo MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 12

Collection Context

Legal Articles: Letter from Monroe Leigh to Lea D. Browning with enclosures MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 16

Collection Context

Legal Articles: Panel Discussion by Association of American Law Schools Panel on the International Criminal Court MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 7

Collection Context

Legal Articles: Selected Articles on the International Criminal Court by Ruth Wedgwood MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 11

Collection Context

Legal Articles: "Symposium: The United States and the International Criminal Court: Achieving a Wider Consensus Through the 'Ithaca Package' " by Ruth Wedgwood MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 8

Collection Context

Legal Articles: "The ICC's Jurisdiction over the Nationals of Non-Party States: A Reply to Ambassador Scheffer" by Michael P. Scharf, as presented October 28, 1999 at National Security Law in a Changing World: The Ninth Annual Review of the Field MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 13

Collection Context

Legal Articles: "The ICC's Jurisdiction over the Nationals of Non-Party States: A Reply to Ambassador Scheffer" by Michael P. Scharf, presented at ABA Section of International Law and Practice Annual Meeting MSS 04-2, Box 2, Folder 10

Collection Context

Legal Articles: "The International Criminal Court: An American View" article by Ruth Wedgwood, European Journal of International Law MSS 04-2, Box 2

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.