Collection: Monroe Leigh papers - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Monroe Leigh papers

Analysis: Wounded and Sick (in Field) Convention MSS 04-2, Box 33, Folder 8

Collection Context

Anderson Telecast of 7/28/78 MSS 04-2, Box 39, Folder 4

Collection Context

Annex G deletions: Selected Treaties, Conventions, and Agreements removed from Annex G MSS 04-2, Box 41, Folder 9

Collection Context

Annex G: Selected Treaties, Conventions, and Agreements MSS 04-2, Box 41, Folder 8

Collection Context

Appointment as Legal Adviser to the State Department MSS 04-2, Box 36, Folder 1

Collection Context

"Apportionment in Indus Basin of Waters Common to Pakistan and India" : For Official Use Only, Confidential MSS 04-2, Box 41, Folder 6

Collection Context

Articles: "Are Only 'Friendly' Foreign Governments Entitled to Sovereign Immunity?" by Gaylen J. Byker, International Practitioner's Notebook, No. 13, January 1981, pp. 1 - 4 MSS 04-2, Box 28, Folder 15

Collection Context

Articles: "Foreign States Sued for Their Acts Abroad: A Uniform Analysis Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act" by Gregory Haworth, Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 3, Spring 1982, pp. 538 - 566 MSS 04-2, Box 28, Folder 10

Collection Context

Articles: "Immunity and Jurisdiction: Toward a Uniform Body of Law in Actions Against Foreign States" by George Kahale, III and Matias A. Vega, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 18:211, 1979, pp. 211 - ? MSS 04-2, Box 28

Collection Context

Articles: [Manuscript] "Execution of Judgments and Foreign Sovereign Immunity" by James Crawford, American Journal of International Law MSS 04-2, Box 28, Folder 18

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.