Collection: Henrico County (Va.) Maps, Plats, Plans and Drawings, 1806-1954 - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Henrico County (Va.) Maps, Plats, Plans and Drawings, 1806-1954

[171 1/2 acres belonging to John George Esq.], 1850 Box 1, Folder 2

Collection Context

206 acres in Charles City Co. adjoining Batchelor's Point surveyed by request of William B. Harrison of Prince George Co. by William Clopton, surveyor of Henrico Co., 1844 Box 7, Folder 4

Collection Context

[3 maps showing plans for constructing the canal and improvements in the James River affecting the property of Dutch Gap Land Corporation, Phillip N. Stoneman, and Albert B. Ruddock], 1931 Box 7, Folder 4

Collection Context

A map of Bremo surveyed at the instance of William N. Whiting, 1837 Box 2, Folder 11

Collection Context

A map of part of the Hermitage Tract belonging to Col. John Mayo situated south of the Richmond Turnpike Rd., 1816 Box 7, Folder 4

Collection Context

A map of Westbrook belonging to estate of William Young. 1838 Box 2, Folder 12

Collection Context

Annexed plat of survey is taken from actual survey made by me at sundry times as well as that of Chappell Island as that part of the city of Richmond thereunto immediately adjoining at the instance of Edward Hinshaw, 1828 Box 7, Folder 4

Collection Context

A plan of Woodville, n.d. Box 2, Folder 27

Collection Context

A portion of the "Fair Field" tract of land near this City which has been surveyed and divided into lots at the request of James Talley and Robert New, 1840 Box 2, Folder 13

Collection Context

Brook Estate....of the late Nathaniel Crenshaw in accordance with his will, 1866 Box 2, Folder 18

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.