Collection: Frank W. McCulloch papers - ARVAS Search Results

Start Over Collection Frank W. McCulloch papers

#447: Roberts--appeals decision that charges brought against R by fellow members were proper for trial proceedings under constitution Box MSS 85-13, Box 11

Collection Context

#448: Executive Board, Local 230 and Abernathy and Jimenez--appeals decision that charges brought by board against an officer were constitutionally insufficient Box MSS 85-13, Box 11

Collection Context

#449: G.M. Unit of Local 222 v. Local 222, U.A.W.--appeals decision to withdraw Local's policy grievance from arbitration Box MSS 85-13, Box 12

[2 folders]

Collection Context

#450: Turner--challenges finding that charges filed against executive board members were constitutionally defective Box MSS 85-13, Box 12

Collection Context

#451: Toth--challenges dismissal of his charges against Local officers Box MSS 85-13, Box 12

Collection Context

#452: Brown--challenges Local's interpretation of bylaws re eligibility for office Box MSS 85-13, Box 12

Collection Context

#453: Hughey--appeals decision that charges brought against fellow board member did not merit trial proceedings Box MSS 85-13, Box 12

Collection Context

#454: Laughery--challenges ruling that a local trial committee's verdict cannot be appealed Box MSS 85-13, Box 12

[2 folders]

Collection Context

#455: Petts--challenges ruling that charges brought against Local chairman were improper under constitution Box MSS 85-13, Box 13

Collection Context

#456: Lanane--appeals rejection of election irregularity claims Box MSS 85-13, Box 13

Collection Context

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.