Search

Start Over Collection Earl Gregg Swem Papers, 1927/1965 Date range 1963

Correspondence of Beverley Ruffin with Earl Gregg Swem, 1947/1964 Box 10, Folder 21

Beverley Ruffin, Danville, VA Earl Gregg Swem, Williamsburg, VA Concerns Ruffin's work as librarian of Longwood College, affairs at the College of William and Mary, and Virginia papers. Includes clippings about Swem. Autographed letters signed, typewritten letters signed, and news clippings. 34 items.

  1. College of William and Mary
  2. Earl Gregg Swem Papers, 1927/1965
  3. Series 1: Earl Gregg Swem Papers, 1927/1965
  4. Box 10: Birthday letters and correspondence

Correspondence of Elizabeth Eades with Earl Gregg Swem, 1948/1964 Box 10, Folder 22

Elizabeth Eades, Andover, MA Earl Gregg Swem, Williamsburg, VA and Louisville, KY Concerns personal and professional information. Autographed letters signed. 17 items. Gift of Miss Elizabeth Eades, February, 1975

  1. College of William and Mary
  2. Earl Gregg Swem Papers, 1927/1965
  3. Series 1: Earl Gregg Swem Papers, 1927/1965
  4. Box 10: Birthday letters and correspondence

Correspondence of Laura Colvin with Dr. and Mrs. Earl Gregg Swem, 1933/1965 Box 10, Folder 20

Laura Colvin, Williamsburg, Va; Ann Arbor, MI; Swarthmore, PA; Decatur, GA; Boston, MA Dr. and Mrs. Earl Gregg Swem, Williamsburg, VA; Louisville, KY; and Washington, DC Includes correspondence of Laura Colvin with Davis Y. Paschall, President of the College of William and Mary. Autographed letter signed and typewritten letters signed. 119 items. Gift of Laura Colvin, February, 1975

  1. College of William and Mary
  2. Earl Gregg Swem Papers, 1927/1965
  3. Series 1: Earl Gregg Swem Papers, 1927/1965
  4. Box 10: Birthday letters and correspondence

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.