Search

Start Over Collection Donald Black papers

Behavior of Law articles by others Box 42, Folder 9

"Relational Distance, Relational Status and Legal Sanctions: A Test of Two Competing Hypotheses" Dale Dannefer; "Light Up or Butt Out: An Assessment of Antismoking Laws in the United States" W. Timothy Austin and Samuel W. Garner; "An Analysis of 'The Behavior of Law': Appellate Litigation Variation Over Trial and Jurisdiction" James W. Meeker; "An Analysis of 'The Behavior of Law': Effects of Organization on Litigation" James W. Meeker; "Empirical Verification of Black's 'The Behavior of Law" John Braithwaite and David Biles; "A Test of Black's Theory of the Behavior of Law" Larry A Hembroff; "Donald Black's So-Called Theory of So-Called Law" David F. Greenberg; "Revenge and the Social Control System: Theory and Empirical Correlates" Norman W. Storer; "The Anthropology of Law Introduction" Vivian J. Rohrl; "A Chippewa Trouble-Case: Toward an Expanded Model of Conflict Resolution" Vivian J. Rohrl; "Toward a Structural Perspective on Gender Bias in the Juvenile Court" William G. Staples.

  1. University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.
  2. Donald Black papers
  3. Additions
  4. Academic Writings: Works by others

Behavior of Law articles by others Box 42, Folder 10

Authors include Setsuo Miyazawa ("Social Movements and Contemporary Rights in Japan: Relative Success Factors in the Field of Environmental Law", J. Langley Miller, Peter H. Rossi, Jon E. Simpson ("Attributes of Just Punishments: An Empirical Test of Black's Theory of Law"), Daniel P. Doyle, David F. Luckenbill ("Mobilizing Law in Response to Collective Problems: A Test of Black's Theory of Law, Kathleen J. Ferraro ("Policing Woman Battering")

  1. University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.
  2. Donald Black papers
  3. Additions
  4. Academic Writings: Works by others

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.