Search

Start Over Subjects notes Level Item

Notes of Albert E. Truby relating to theAgreement between the History of Yellow Fever and its Transmission By the Culex Mosquito (Stegomyia of Theobald) 1 page Box 30, Folder 14, Box 30, Folder 14

  1. University of Virginia, Special Collections Dept.
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever collection
  3. Series III. Walter Reed
  4. Excerpt from theAgreement between the History of Yellow Fever and its Transmission By the Culex Mosquito (Stegomyia of Theobald), by Carlos J. Finlay with related notes

Notes of Albert E. Truby relating to theAgreement between the History of Yellow Fever and its Transmission By the Culex Mosquito (Stegomyia of Theobald) circa 1935-1955 1 page Box 30, Folder 14, Box 30, Folder 14

  1. University of Virginia, Health Sciences Library
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collectioncirca 1800-circa 1998 bulk 1863-1974
  3. Series III. Walter Reed1806-circa 1955 bulk 1874-1936
  4. Excerpt from theAgreement between the History of Yellow Fever and its Transmission By the Culex Mosquito (Stegomyia of Theobald), by Carlos J. Finlay with related notes circa 1912-1955

Notes of an interview with Jefferson Randolph Kean October 21, 1929 2 pages Box 62, Folder 74

The interview centers on Kean's reluctance to give credit to the work done by Roger Ames during the yellow fever experiments.

  1. University of Virginia, Health Sciences Library
  2. Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collectioncirca 1800-circa 1998 bulk 1863-1974
  3. Series VII. Truby-Kean-Henchcirca 1879-circa 1960 bulk 1900-1954
  4. Correspondence of Jefferson Randolph Kean1929

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.