Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Collection Louisa County (Va.) Muster Roll of Louisa County in the War in Defense of Virginia, 1861-1865 Remove constraint Collection: Louisa County (Va.) Muster Roll of Louisa County in the War in Defense of Virginia, 1861-1865 Subjects Veterans -- Confederate States of America. Remove constraint Subjects: Veterans -- Confederate States of America.

Search Results

Louisa County (Va.) Muster Roll of Louisa County in the War in Defense of Virginia, 1861-1865

Abstract Or Scope

Louisa County (Va.) Muster Roll of Louisa County in the War in Defense of Virginia, 1861-1865, consists of two muster rolls compiled in 1905 and 1910 from roll lists, ordinance reports and participants' memory of men from Louisa County who served in the Civil War. The muster rolls contain information about the Thirteenth Regiment Virginia Infantry, Company D, Earley's Brigade, Stonewall Jackson Corps; and the Twenty Third Regiment Virginia Volunteers Infantry, Company G, Fredericks Hall Grays. Notes in the muster roll state that the Thirteenth Regiment, Company D was organized in 1860. Notes about the Twenty Third Regiment state that the company was organized at Fredericks Hall about April 1, 1861, and mustered in Richmond aobut May 1, 1861, where they were attached to the Twenty Third Regiment as Company G. Information recorded includes names, when and where mustered, by whom, when company was mustered in, and remarks such as when and where killed, deserted, wounded, etc. The lists are arranged with officers first and then all others alphabetically by surname. The two muster rolls occupy pp. 1-7 of the volume.

1 result

Louisa County (Va.) Muster Roll of Louisa County in the War in Defense of Virginia, 1861-1865

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.