Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects University of Virginia. School of Law -- History Remove constraint Subjects: University of Virginia. School of Law -- History

Search Results

A. E. Dick Howard papers

34.5 Cubic Feet 82 archival boxes
Abstract Or Scope

The papers of A. E. Dick Howard reflect his academic and professional endeavors. The archives have received five installments of papers from Professor Howard, plus an entire collection: The Papers of A. E. Dick Howard for the Virginia Commission for Constitutional Revision, received in 1981, MSS 81-4. Papers related to the nomination of Judge Robert Bork to the Supreme Court: these files consist of some reports and statements in relation to the nomination of Judge Robert H. Bork to the Supreme Court. Professor Howard was a commentator on the McNeil/Lehrer NewsHour during the confirmation hearings. Bill O'Brien, a student assistant, helped him to collect all of the information. Addendum [a]: Central and Eastern European New Constitutions: these files relate to Howard's involvement on the writing of new constitutions in Central and Eastern Europe at the collapse of the Soviet Union. The files were processed trying to convey their original organization and consist of correspondence, memoranda, working papers and numerous printed materials.

1 result

Armistead Mason Dobie papers

6 Linear Feet 15 boxes (6 linear ft.)
Abstract Or Scope

The papers of Armistead M. Dobie span the years 1902 to 1963, with the bulk of the material covering 1939 to 1956, the years of Dobie's judgeship. The first three boxes contain general correspondence, which is primarily of biographical interest, although there are some items, especially the 1939 letters from President Franklin D. Roosevelt, and senators Carter Glass and Harry F. Byrd, that have historical value. The correspondence with Judges John J. Parker and Morris A. Soper in the general files, as well as in the court materials, yield very little information about the cases the three were considering. Other correspondents who wrote Dobie one or two letters of interest were Felix Frankfurter, Stanley Reed, Roscoe Pound, Samuel Williston, Manton Davis, and many former University classmates and students. The general correspondence files were kept alphabetically by correspondent's name or, occasionally, by subject, and within the alphabetical division the correspondence is arranged chronologically. Following the correspondence are four notebooks of mimeographed "textbooks" from Dobie's graduate studies at Harvard and teaching at Virginia in the 1920s.

1 result

Armistead Mason Dobie papers 6 Linear Feet 15 boxes (6 linear ft.)

Clarence B. Pearce papers

80 items
Abstract Or Scope

The papers of Clarence B. Pearce consist primarily of letters written by Pearce to his mother as well as photographs of Pearce and the University of Virginia grounds while Pearce was a law student (1917 - 1921). His college activities included participation in the debating society and service on the editorial board of Virgina Law Review.

1 result

Clarence B. Pearce papers 80 items

1 result

Frederick D. G. Ribble papers

12.5 Linear Feet 32 boxes
Abstract Or Scope

The Frederick D. G. Ribble papers document his years as professor and dean at the University of Virginia Law School, his service on professional boards and committees, the legal cases in which he was directly involved or interested, and, to a limited extent, his personal life before his marriage.

1 result

Frederick D. G. Ribble papers 12.5 Linear Feet 32 boxes

Garrard Glenn papers

3.3 Cubic Feet 2 cartons and 4 archival boxes
1 result

Garrard Glenn papers 3.3 Cubic Feet 2 cartons and 4 archival boxes

George B. Eager Jr. papers

.2 Linear Feet 1 small archival box, 2 folders
Abstract Or Scope

The George B. Eager collection fills only one folder and spans less than one year, 1933. As the first letter indicates, Eager solicited alumni to write to the Rector and Visitors of the University endorsing the appointment of John L. Newcomb as president. The rest of the collection is mostly letters from alumni endorsing Newcomb. Correspondence and clippings at the end of the file indicate that Eager was successful.

1 result

George B. Eager Jr. papers .2 Linear Feet 1 small archival box, 2 folders

Herbert Johnson papers

.3 Linear Feet 1 box
Abstract Or Scope

This collection consists of correspondence between Herbert Johnson (Law 1927) and law professors Hardy C. Dillard, Frederick D. G. Ribble, John Rictchie III, T. Munford Boyd, Dean Monrad Paulsen, UVA President Colgate M. Darden, the Law School Foundation, and law alumni.

1 result

Herbert Johnson papers .3 Linear Feet 1 box

Historical research collection - University of Virginia School of Law

.000186 Gigabytes
Abstract Or Scope

This collection contains items that librarians and archivists have used while researching the history of the University of Virginia School of Law. These materials include unpublished essays, published historical articles, datasets, and research notes.

1 result

Historical research collection - University of Virginia School of Law .000186 Gigabytes

John B. Minor papers

.3 Linear Feet 1 archival box of 50 items
Abstract Or Scope

The collection includes lectures and other teaching materials, correspondence, clippings and other printed matter, legal documents, an appraisal of enslaved people, a commonplace book, and a recipe for making indelible ink.

1 result

John B. Minor papers .3 Linear Feet 1 archival box of 50 items

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.