Collections

Start Over Subjects Tobacco--Virginia--Roanoke County. Level Collection
Library of Virginia

Roanoke County (Va.) Court Records, 1823-1849

Roanoke County (Va.) Court Records, 1823-1849. The collection contains seven documents removed from Roanoke County court records: a deed between William Richards, John Lister, and Jacob Helms, 1823; a letter from G.W. Wingfield to Frederick Johnston, 1829; a subpoena from the chancery cause George Dillard, etc. vs. Louisa Dillard, widow of Charles Dillard, etc., 1841; a Greenbrier County (West) Virginia Court of Appeals ruling, 1845, on a Botetourt County Circuit Superior Court of Law and Chancery decree from the chancery cause John Campbell vs. Executor of William Rowland; a letter, 1845, from A. S. Broaddus to F. Johnston pertaining to the estate of Charles Dillard; an answer, 1842, from the chancery cause John Faris vs. Henry Martin; and a letter from John McClanahan to J. Bushong with information about the sale of some tobacco, 1849.

1 result

Roanoke County (Va.) Court Records, 1823-1849

Roanoke County (Va.) Circuit Court

Roanoke County (Va.) Court Records, 1823-1849. The collection contains seven documents removed from Roanoke County court records: a deed between William Richards, John Lister, and Jacob Helms, 1823; a letter from G.W. Wingfield to Frederick Johnston, 1829; a subpoena from the chancery cause George Dillard, etc. vs. Louisa Dillard, widow of Charles Dillard, etc., 1841; a Greenbrier County (West) Virginia Court of Appeals ruling, 1845, on a Botetourt County Circuit Superior Court of Law and Chancery decree from the chancery cause John Campbell vs. Executor of William Rowland; a letter, 1845, from A. S. Broaddus to F. Johnston pertaining to the estate of Charles Dillard; an answer, 1842, from the chancery cause John Faris vs. Henry Martin; and a letter from John McClanahan to J. Bushong with information about the sale of some tobacco, 1849.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.