Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects Slavery--Virginia--Bedford County. Remove constraint Subjects: Slavery--Virginia--Bedford County.

Search Results

Bedford County (Va.) Deposition, 1760

Abstract Or Scope

Bedford County (Va.) Deposition, 1760. Consists of the testimony of George Stovall, Jr., pertaining to Christopher Irvine's degree of satisfaction with a slave he had purchased from James Roberts, Jr.

1 result

Bedford County (Va.) Deposition, 1760

Bedford County (Va.) Thomas Phelps Estate Sale, January 1852

Abstract Or Scope

Bedford County (Va.) Thomas Phelps Estate Sale Inventory, January 1852. Consists of a list of items sold, the names of individual purchasers, and the amount paid for each item. Also includes a record of the division of the eleven slaves in the estate in a drawing for seven lots.

1 result

Bedford County (Va.) Thomas Phelps Estate Sale, January 1852

Campbell County (Va.) Bill of Sale, Callaway to Steptoe, Slaves, 1822

Abstract Or Scope

Campbell County (Va.) Bill of Sale, Callaway to Steptoe, Slaves, 1822. Documents the sale of nine slaves from George Callaway of Nelson County to James Steptoe, Sr. of Bedford County.

1 result

Campbell County (Va.) Bill of Sale, Callaway to Steptoe, Slaves, 1822

Campbell County (Va.) Inventory and Estate of James Bullock, 1785

Abstract Or Scope

Campbell County (Va.) Inventory and Estate of James Bullock, 1785. Consists of an inventory and appraisal of the personal property of James Bullock, which includes eight slaves (Isham, Tony, Cloe, Sarah, Jane, Mary, Suzy, and Peter), four horses, sixteen head of cattle, two sheep, twenty head of hogs, and household furniture.

1 result

Campbell County (Va.) Inventory and Estate of James Bullock, 1785

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.