Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects Politics and government. Remove constraint Subjects: Politics and government.

Search Results

Johnson Newlon Camden (1828-1908) Papers, 1881 0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 2 items (1 folder)

John Thomas McGraw (1856-1920) Papers, 1842/1948 3.75 Linear Feet Summary: 3 ft. 9 in. (9 document cases, 5 in. each)

John W. Davis (1873-1955) Papers, 1924/1953 0.1 Linear Feet Summary: 1/2 in. (1 folder)

John W. Davis, Lawyer, Papers, 1842/1978 3.54 Linear Feet 3 ft. 6.5 in. (4 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 small flat storage box, 3 in.); (1 large flat storage box, 3 in.); (1 large flat storage box, 3.5 in.); (1 box, 4 in.); (2 boxes, 4 1/2 in. each); (5 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each)

Jonathan M. Bennett (1816-1887) Papers, 1785/1899 33.6 Linear Feet Summary: 33 ft. 7 in. (80 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 document case, 2 1/2 in.); (1 folder, 1/4 in.); (1 oversize folder, 1/4 in.)

Joseph B. Lightburn Papers, 1958/1959 0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1/2 in. (1 folder)

Joseph B. Lightburn Papers regarding Conservative Politics, 1957/1970 0.25 Linear Feet 2 1/2 in. (2 folders, 1 1/2 in.); (1 oversize folder, 1 in.)

Justus Collins (1857-1934) Papers, 1887/1962 23.3 Linear Feet Summary: 23 ft. 4 1/4 in. (56 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 oversize folder, 1/4 in.)

J.V. Blair Printed Materials, 1876/1898 0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1 in. (1 folder)

J.V. Blair Printed Materials, 1894/1902 0.01 Linear Feet Summary: 1 in. (1 folder)

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.