Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Places Monongalia County (W. Va.) Remove constraint Places: Monongalia County (W. Va.) Subjects Judges - letters and papers. Remove constraint Subjects: Judges - letters and papers.

Search Results

Charles G. Baker (1890-1982) Papers, 1929/1952

0.8 Linear Feet Summary: 10 in. (2 document cases, 5 in. each)
Abstract Or Scope
Instructions to the grand jury and opinions of the judge of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit (Monongalia County).
1 result

Charles G. Baker (1890-1982) Papers, 1929/1952 0.8 Linear Feet Summary: 10 in. (2 document cases, 5 in. each)

Edward C. Bunker (1830-1867) Papers, 1850/1901

0.8 Linear Feet Summary: 10 in. (2 document cases, 5 in. each)
Abstract Or Scope
Legal papers of a Morgantown lawyer, partner of United States Senator Waitman T. Willey, prosecuting attorney of Monongalia County, state senator, and judge of the Eleventh Circuit Court. Included are papers which relate to Bunker's Civil War service and Willey's legal practice. There are a few items of correspondence on land speculation and immigration in post-Civil War West Virginia.
1 result

Edward C. Bunker (1830-1867) Papers, 1850/1901 0.8 Linear Feet Summary: 10 in. (2 document cases, 5 in. each)

Minter L. Wilson (d.1968) Papers, 1920/1944

0.5 Linear Feet Summary: 6 in. (2 small flat storage boxes, 3 in. each)
Abstract Or Scope
Eight volumes of copies and original speeches and legal opinions of Minter L. Wilson, lawyer and judge of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Monongalia County, West Virginia, 1937-1945.
1 result

Minter L. Wilson (d.1968) Papers, 1920/1944 0.5 Linear Feet Summary: 6 in. (2 small flat storage boxes, 3 in. each)

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.