Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects Health and Medical--Virginia--Louisa County. Remove constraint Subjects: Health and Medical--Virginia--Louisa County.

Search Results

Louisa County (Va.) Health and Medical Records, 1771-1902

.225 cf; legal-sized half-hollinger box
Abstract Or Scope

Louisa County (Va.) Health and Medical Records 1771-1902, consist of two series: Mental Health Records and Smallpox Epidemic Records.

1 result

Louisa County (Va.) Health and Medical Records, 1771-1902 .225 cf; legal-sized half-hollinger box

Louisa County (Va.) Judgment, Lewis Yancey, surviving partner vs. Louisa County, 1906 May

.225 cf; legal-sized half-hollinger box
Abstract Or Scope

Louisa County (Va.) Judgment, Lewis Yancey, surviving partner vs. Louisa County, 1906 May, pertains to a smallpox outbreak of Dec. 1902-Apr. 1903, during which a local dry goods business, Yancey Brothers, served as a quarantine hospital and all goods/wares were ordered destroyed afterward. Legal issue in question was whether the county was liable to Yancey for goods used and/or destroyed during the four-month outbreak, and whether all information was correctly provided to the jury. Other issues in question relate to proper use of authority and eminent domain vs. police power. Includes printed proceedings as the county appealed, and later was heard by the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals as Louisa County v. Yancey's Trustee et al. Jan 21, 1909. Documents reference the actions of Dr. P.P. May and the service of colored nurse "Davy" David Woofolk for 94 days between Dec 29, 1902-Apr 5, 1903.

1 result

Louisa County (Va.) Judgment, Lewis Yancey, surviving partner vs. Louisa County, 1906 May .225 cf; legal-sized half-hollinger box

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.