Search

Start Over Subjects Court records--Virginia--Carroll County.
Library of Virginia

Carroll County (Va.) Bond, 1862

Carroll County (Va.) Bond, 1862, consists of a bond between the Commonwealth and John W. Mathews, with John Edwards as his security.

1 result

Carroll County (Va.) Bond, 1862

Carroll County (Va.) Circuit Court

Carroll County (Va.) Bond, 1862, consists of a bond between the Commonwealth and John W. Mathews, with John Edwards as his security.

Library of Virginia

Carroll County (Va.) Various Court Records 1888-1899

Carroll County (Va.) Various Court Records, 1888-1899. Consists of an execution from the court case, Commonwealth vs. Jane Stonerman, 1888; a search warrant for the house of Rebecca Kelly, in response to a complaint of theft from Ira Norvell, 1896; a receipt pertaining to the court case Lancheiner and Sons vs. Owens, 1898; a receipt from P.T. Beamer, Trustee, 1890; and a subpoena for the testimony of Henry Carter on behalf of George Davis in the court case Commonwealth vs. George Davis, 1899.

1 result

Carroll County (Va.) Various Court Records 1888-1899

Carroll County (Va.) Circuit Court.

Carroll County (Va.) Various Court Records, 1888-1899. Consists of an execution from the court case, Commonwealth vs. Jane Stonerman, 1888; a search warrant for the house of Rebecca Kelly, in response to a complaint of theft from Ira Norvell, 1896; a receipt pertaining to the court case Lancheiner and Sons vs. Owens, 1898; a receipt from P.T. Beamer, Trustee, 1890; and a subpoena for the testimony of Henry Carter on behalf of George Davis in the court case Commonwealth vs. George Davis, 1899.

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.