Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Subjects Coat-of-Arms Remove constraint Subjects: Coat-of-Arms

Search Results

College of William and Mary Coat of Arms, 1929

0.20 Cubic Feet
Abstract Or Scope

This 1929 copy of the 1694/1698 Granting of Arms to the College of William and Mary from the College of Arms in London is enclosed in a plexiglass mount. At the top of the document are four arms: the College of William and Mary, an unknown one, the King's, and the College of Arms.

1 result

College of William and Mary Coat of Arms, 1929 0.20 Cubic Feet

Lord Botetourt coat of arms

0.26 Cubic Feet
Abstract Or Scope

Framed Coat of Arms for Lord Botetourt. A label adhered on the back reads "Finely engraved on copper and printed on hand made paper, from Joseph Edmonson's Baronagium Genealogicum, published London 1764. Edmonson was Mowbray Herald Extraordinary of the College of Arms of Great Britain. His work is one of the most authoritative and beautiful publications on Heraldry."

1 result

Lord Botetourt coat of arms 0.26 Cubic Feet

Merchant Taylors' Company of London, Coat-of-Arms, 1870, bulk 1870

1.00 Linear Feet
Abstract Or Scope

Coat-of-Arms of the Merchant Taylors' Company of London, circa 1870. Framed reverse painting on glass, backed by beige linen. Artist unknown. Motto: "Concordia parvae res crescunt." [In harmony, small things grow]

1 result

Merchant Taylors' Company of London, Coat-of-Arms, 1870, bulk 1870 1.00 Linear Feet

William & Mary seal, 1920/1930

1.2 Linear Feet 1 item in 14x18 oversized box
Abstract Or Scope

The collection contains 1 wooden object in the shape of the seal of William & Mary. It likely dates to the 1920s as it reflects the seal used by William & Mary up until 1929.

1 result

William & Mary seal, 1920/1930 1.2 Linear Feet 1 item in 14x18 oversized box

Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.

Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.

Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.