Search Results
Stanton C. Crawford, Collector, Papers, 1842/1964 0.25 Linear Feet Summary: 3 in. (2 folders)
Storer College Correspondence, Business Papers and Other Material, 1854/1964 21.3 Linear Feet Summary: 21 ft. 4 in. (39 document cases, 5 in. each); (4 document cases, 2 1/2 in. each); (2 records cartons, 15 in. each); (1 small flat storage box, 3 in.); (1 large flat storage box, 3 in.); (2 large flat storage boxes, 3 1/2 in. each); (1 card file box, 4 in.); (1 roll storage box, 4 in.)
Stratford Players Records, 1920/1983 1.82 cubic feet 5 boxes
Tazewell Family Papers, 1838/1978, bulk 1860/1870 1.50 Linear Feet
Thomas W. Dixon, Collector, Papers, 1869/1964 0.42 Linear Feet 5 in. (1 document case)
Thoney Pietro, Contractor, Papers, 1867/1982 5.77 Linear Feet 5 ft. 9.25 in. (8 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 document case, 2.5 in.); (1 records carton, 15 in.); (1 flat storage box, 3 in.); (2 flat storage boxes, 1.5 in. each); (1 roll, 5 in.); (5 oversize folders, 0.75 in.)
United Glass and Ceramic Workers of America Local Union No. 2 (Clarksburg, WV) Papers, 1934/1974 10.6 Linear Feet 10 ft. 6 1/2 in. (24 document cases, 5 in. each); (1 document case, 2 1/2 in.); (6 unboxed ledgers, 4 in.)
United Toy Workers Union, Local 149, Archives, 1941/1966 4.72 Linear Feet Summary: 4 ft. 8 1/2 in. (10 document cases, 5 in.); (1 small flat storage box, 3 in.); (1 oversize folder, 1 item); (2 reels of microfilm, 1.75 in. each)
Vaiden Family Papers, 1799/1982 0.25 Linear Feet
Content Warning
ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids.
Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity.
Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids.