{"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File","last":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026page=1"},"meta":{"pages":{"current_page":1,"next_page":null,"prev_page":null,"total_pages":1,"limit_value":10,"offset_value":0,"total_count":10,"first_page?":true,"last_page?":true}},"data":[{"id":"vi_vi03752_c01","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"1882-052: John Slack vs. John W. Carnes etc.","abstract_or_scope":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c01#abstract_or_scope","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":"\u003cp\u003eThe defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the \u003cem\u003eEmory and Henry Casket\u003c/em\u003e a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit. \u003c/p\u003e","label":"Abstract Or Scope"}},"breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c01#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi03752_c01","ref_ssm":["vi_vi03752_c01"],"id":"vi_vi03752_c01","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssi":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","1882-052: John Slack vs. John W. Carnes etc.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n"],"title_filing_ssi":"1882-052: John Slack vs. John W. Carnes etc.","title_ssm":["1882-052: John Slack vs. John W. Carnes etc."],"title_tesim":["1882-052: John Slack vs. John W. Carnes etc."],"normalized_title_ssm":["1882-052: John Slack vs. John W. Carnes etc."],"component_level_isim":[1],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":1,"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the \u003ctitle render=\"italic\"\u003eEmory and Henry Casket\u003c/title\u003e a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n"],"_nest_path_":"/components#0","timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi03752","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi03752.xml","title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes).","There are no restrictions.\n","Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)","Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"," Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n","Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site.","Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n","Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n","Library of Virginia\n","English\n"],"collection_title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"creator_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["These materials came to the Library of Virginia in a transfer of court papers from Lee County in 2009 under accession number 44298."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes)."],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eOrganized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eContext for Record Type:\u003c/emph\u003e Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLocality History:\u003c/emph\u003e Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLost Locality Note:\u003c/emph\u003e Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Historical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n"],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePost-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEncoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":[" Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n"],"relatedmaterial_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eAdditional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"https://www.lva.virginia.gov/public/local/results_all.asp?CountyID=VA149\"\u003e\"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"\u003c/extref\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/lost\"\u003eLost Records Localities Digital Collection\u003c/extref\u003e found at the Library of Virginia web site.\u003c/p\u003e"],"relatedmaterial_heading_ssm":["Related Material\n"],"relatedmaterial_tesim":["Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThese records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the \u003ctitle render=\"italic\"\u003eEmory and Henry Casket\u003c/title\u003e a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLouisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eF. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArdill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/\"\u003eChancery Records Index\u003c/extref\u003e available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n"],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Location\"\u003eLibrary of Virginia\n\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["Library of Virginia\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":10,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c01"}},{"id":"vi_vi03752_c02","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"1887-019: Mary V. Pennington by etc. vs. M. C. Parsons etc.","abstract_or_scope":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c02#abstract_or_scope","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":"\u003cp\u003eMary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts. \u003c/p\u003e","label":"Abstract Or Scope"}},"breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c02#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi03752_c02","ref_ssm":["vi_vi03752_c02"],"id":"vi_vi03752_c02","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssi":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","1887-019: Mary V. Pennington by etc. vs. M. C. Parsons etc.","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n"],"title_filing_ssi":"1887-019: Mary V. Pennington by etc. vs. M. C. Parsons etc.","title_ssm":["1887-019: Mary V. Pennington by etc. vs. M. C. Parsons etc."],"title_tesim":["1887-019: Mary V. Pennington by etc. vs. M. C. Parsons etc."],"normalized_title_ssm":["1887-019: Mary V. Pennington by etc. vs. M. C. Parsons etc."],"component_level_isim":[1],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":2,"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eMary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n"],"_nest_path_":"/components#1","timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi03752","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi03752.xml","title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes).","There are no restrictions.\n","Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)","Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"," Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n","Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site.","Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n","Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n","Library of Virginia\n","English\n"],"collection_title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"creator_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["These materials came to the Library of Virginia in a transfer of court papers from Lee County in 2009 under accession number 44298."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes)."],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eOrganized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eContext for Record Type:\u003c/emph\u003e Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLocality History:\u003c/emph\u003e Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLost Locality Note:\u003c/emph\u003e Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Historical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n"],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePost-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEncoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":[" Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n"],"relatedmaterial_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eAdditional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"https://www.lva.virginia.gov/public/local/results_all.asp?CountyID=VA149\"\u003e\"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"\u003c/extref\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/lost\"\u003eLost Records Localities Digital Collection\u003c/extref\u003e found at the Library of Virginia web site.\u003c/p\u003e"],"relatedmaterial_heading_ssm":["Related Material\n"],"relatedmaterial_tesim":["Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThese records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the \u003ctitle render=\"italic\"\u003eEmory and Henry Casket\u003c/title\u003e a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLouisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eF. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArdill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/\"\u003eChancery Records Index\u003c/extref\u003e available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n"],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Location\"\u003eLibrary of Virginia\n\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["Library of Virginia\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":10,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c02"}},{"id":"vi_vi03752_c03","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"1891-012: Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. vs. Nimrod Noe","abstract_or_scope":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c03#abstract_or_scope","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":"\u003cp\u003eLouisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \u003c/p\u003e","label":"Abstract Or Scope"}},"breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c03#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi03752_c03","ref_ssm":["vi_vi03752_c03"],"id":"vi_vi03752_c03","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssi":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","1891-012: Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. vs. Nimrod Noe","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n"],"title_filing_ssi":"1891-012: Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. vs. Nimrod Noe","title_ssm":["1891-012: Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. vs. Nimrod Noe"],"title_tesim":["1891-012: Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. vs. Nimrod Noe"],"normalized_title_ssm":["1891-012: Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. vs. Nimrod Noe"],"component_level_isim":[1],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":3,"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLouisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n"],"_nest_path_":"/components#2","timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi03752","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi03752.xml","title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes).","There are no restrictions.\n","Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)","Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"," Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n","Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site.","Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n","Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n","Library of Virginia\n","English\n"],"collection_title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"creator_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["These materials came to the Library of Virginia in a transfer of court papers from Lee County in 2009 under accession number 44298."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes)."],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eOrganized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eContext for Record Type:\u003c/emph\u003e Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLocality History:\u003c/emph\u003e Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLost Locality Note:\u003c/emph\u003e Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Historical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n"],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePost-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEncoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":[" Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n"],"relatedmaterial_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eAdditional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"https://www.lva.virginia.gov/public/local/results_all.asp?CountyID=VA149\"\u003e\"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"\u003c/extref\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/lost\"\u003eLost Records Localities Digital Collection\u003c/extref\u003e found at the Library of Virginia web site.\u003c/p\u003e"],"relatedmaterial_heading_ssm":["Related Material\n"],"relatedmaterial_tesim":["Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThese records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the \u003ctitle render=\"italic\"\u003eEmory and Henry Casket\u003c/title\u003e a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLouisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eF. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArdill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/\"\u003eChancery Records Index\u003c/extref\u003e available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n"],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Location\"\u003eLibrary of Virginia\n\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["Library of Virginia\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":10,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c03"}},{"id":"vi_vi03752_c04","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"1894-082: Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner","abstract_or_scope":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c04#abstract_or_scope","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":"\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \u003c/p\u003e","label":"Abstract Or Scope"}},"breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c04#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi03752_c04","ref_ssm":["vi_vi03752_c04"],"id":"vi_vi03752_c04","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssi":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","1894-082: Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n"],"title_filing_ssi":"1894-082: Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner ","title_ssm":["1894-082: Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner"],"title_tesim":["1894-082: Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner"],"normalized_title_ssm":["1894-082: Lilly C. Turner vs. Richard M. Turner"],"component_level_isim":[1],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":4,"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_tesim":["A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n"],"_nest_path_":"/components#3","timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi03752","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi03752.xml","title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes).","There are no restrictions.\n","Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)","Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"," Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n","Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site.","Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n","Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n","Library of Virginia\n","English\n"],"collection_title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"creator_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["These materials came to the Library of Virginia in a transfer of court papers from Lee County in 2009 under accession number 44298."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes)."],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eOrganized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eContext for Record Type:\u003c/emph\u003e Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLocality History:\u003c/emph\u003e Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLost Locality Note:\u003c/emph\u003e Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Historical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n"],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePost-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEncoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":[" Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n"],"relatedmaterial_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eAdditional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"https://www.lva.virginia.gov/public/local/results_all.asp?CountyID=VA149\"\u003e\"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"\u003c/extref\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/lost\"\u003eLost Records Localities Digital Collection\u003c/extref\u003e found at the Library of Virginia web site.\u003c/p\u003e"],"relatedmaterial_heading_ssm":["Related Material\n"],"relatedmaterial_tesim":["Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThese records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the \u003ctitle render=\"italic\"\u003eEmory and Henry Casket\u003c/title\u003e a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLouisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eF. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArdill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/\"\u003eChancery Records Index\u003c/extref\u003e available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n"],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Location\"\u003eLibrary of Virginia\n\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["Library of Virginia\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":10,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c04"}},{"id":"vi_vi03752_c05","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"1897-006: F. E. Parsons, widow vs. Ellen Jessee etc.","abstract_or_scope":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c05#abstract_or_scope","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":"\u003cp\u003eF. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property. \u003c/p\u003e","label":"Abstract Or Scope"}},"breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c05#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi03752_c05","ref_ssm":["vi_vi03752_c05"],"id":"vi_vi03752_c05","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssi":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","1897-006: F. E. Parsons, widow vs. Ellen Jessee etc.","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n"],"title_filing_ssi":"1897-006: F. E. Parsons, widow vs. Ellen Jessee etc.","title_ssm":["1897-006: F. E. Parsons, widow vs. Ellen Jessee etc."],"title_tesim":["1897-006: F. E. Parsons, widow vs. Ellen Jessee etc."],"normalized_title_ssm":["1897-006: F. E. Parsons, widow vs. Ellen Jessee etc."],"component_level_isim":[1],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":5,"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eF. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_tesim":["F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n"],"_nest_path_":"/components#4","timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi03752","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi03752.xml","title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes).","There are no restrictions.\n","Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)","Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"," Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n","Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site.","Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n","Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n","Library of Virginia\n","English\n"],"collection_title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"creator_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["These materials came to the Library of Virginia in a transfer of court papers from Lee County in 2009 under accession number 44298."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes)."],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eOrganized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eContext for Record Type:\u003c/emph\u003e Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLocality History:\u003c/emph\u003e Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLost Locality Note:\u003c/emph\u003e Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Historical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n"],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePost-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEncoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":[" Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n"],"relatedmaterial_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eAdditional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"https://www.lva.virginia.gov/public/local/results_all.asp?CountyID=VA149\"\u003e\"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"\u003c/extref\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/lost\"\u003eLost Records Localities Digital Collection\u003c/extref\u003e found at the Library of Virginia web site.\u003c/p\u003e"],"relatedmaterial_heading_ssm":["Related Material\n"],"relatedmaterial_tesim":["Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThese records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the \u003ctitle render=\"italic\"\u003eEmory and Henry Casket\u003c/title\u003e a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLouisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eF. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArdill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/\"\u003eChancery Records Index\u003c/extref\u003e available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n"],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Location\"\u003eLibrary of Virginia\n\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["Library of Virginia\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":10,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c05"}},{"id":"vi_vi03752_c06","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"1902-003: Petition of A. L. Loyd, admr.","abstract_or_scope":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c06#abstract_or_scope","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":"\u003cp\u003eThe petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit. \u003c/p\u003e","label":"Abstract Or Scope"}},"breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c06#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi03752_c06","ref_ssm":["vi_vi03752_c06"],"id":"vi_vi03752_c06","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssi":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","1902-003: Petition of A. L. Loyd, admr.","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n"],"title_filing_ssi":"1902-003: Petition of A. L. Loyd, admr.","title_ssm":["1902-003: Petition of A. L. Loyd, admr."],"title_tesim":["1902-003: Petition of A. L. Loyd, admr."],"normalized_title_ssm":["1902-003: Petition of A. L. Loyd, admr."],"component_level_isim":[1],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":6,"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThe petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_tesim":["The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n"],"_nest_path_":"/components#5","timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi03752","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi03752.xml","title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes).","There are no restrictions.\n","Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)","Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"," Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n","Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site.","Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n","Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n","Library of Virginia\n","English\n"],"collection_title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"creator_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["These materials came to the Library of Virginia in a transfer of court papers from Lee County in 2009 under accession number 44298."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes)."],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eOrganized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eContext for Record Type:\u003c/emph\u003e Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLocality History:\u003c/emph\u003e Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLost Locality Note:\u003c/emph\u003e Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Historical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n"],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePost-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEncoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":[" Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n"],"relatedmaterial_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eAdditional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"https://www.lva.virginia.gov/public/local/results_all.asp?CountyID=VA149\"\u003e\"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"\u003c/extref\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/lost\"\u003eLost Records Localities Digital Collection\u003c/extref\u003e found at the Library of Virginia web site.\u003c/p\u003e"],"relatedmaterial_heading_ssm":["Related Material\n"],"relatedmaterial_tesim":["Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThese records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the \u003ctitle render=\"italic\"\u003eEmory and Henry Casket\u003c/title\u003e a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLouisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eF. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArdill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/\"\u003eChancery Records Index\u003c/extref\u003e available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n"],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Location\"\u003eLibrary of Virginia\n\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["Library of Virginia\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":10,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c06"}},{"id":"vi_vi03752_c07","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"1903-043: Mollie Monroe vs. Robert Monroe","abstract_or_scope":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c07#abstract_or_scope","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":"\u003cp\u003eA Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \u003c/p\u003e","label":"Abstract Or Scope"}},"breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c07#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi03752_c07","ref_ssm":["vi_vi03752_c07"],"id":"vi_vi03752_c07","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssi":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","1903-043: Mollie Monroe vs. Robert Monroe","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n"],"title_filing_ssi":"1903-043: Mollie Monroe vs. Robert Monroe","title_ssm":["1903-043: Mollie Monroe vs. Robert Monroe"],"title_tesim":["1903-043: Mollie Monroe vs. Robert Monroe"],"normalized_title_ssm":["1903-043: Mollie Monroe vs. Robert Monroe"],"component_level_isim":[1],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":7,"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eA Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_tesim":["A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n"],"_nest_path_":"/components#6","timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi03752","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi03752.xml","title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes).","There are no restrictions.\n","Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)","Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"," Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n","Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site.","Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n","Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n","Library of Virginia\n","English\n"],"collection_title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"creator_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["These materials came to the Library of Virginia in a transfer of court papers from Lee County in 2009 under accession number 44298."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes)."],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eOrganized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eContext for Record Type:\u003c/emph\u003e Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLocality History:\u003c/emph\u003e Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLost Locality Note:\u003c/emph\u003e Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Historical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n"],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePost-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEncoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":[" Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n"],"relatedmaterial_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eAdditional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"https://www.lva.virginia.gov/public/local/results_all.asp?CountyID=VA149\"\u003e\"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"\u003c/extref\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/lost\"\u003eLost Records Localities Digital Collection\u003c/extref\u003e found at the Library of Virginia web site.\u003c/p\u003e"],"relatedmaterial_heading_ssm":["Related Material\n"],"relatedmaterial_tesim":["Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThese records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the \u003ctitle render=\"italic\"\u003eEmory and Henry Casket\u003c/title\u003e a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLouisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eF. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArdill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/\"\u003eChancery Records Index\u003c/extref\u003e available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n"],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Location\"\u003eLibrary of Virginia\n\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["Library of Virginia\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":10,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c07"}},{"id":"vi_vi03752_c08","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"1904-048: W. E. Neff vs. Mary E. Neff","abstract_or_scope":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c08#abstract_or_scope","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":"\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person. \u003c/p\u003e","label":"Abstract Or Scope"}},"breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c08#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi03752_c08","ref_ssm":["vi_vi03752_c08"],"id":"vi_vi03752_c08","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssi":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","1904-048: W. E. Neff vs. Mary E. Neff","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n"],"title_filing_ssi":"1904-048: W. E. Neff vs. Mary E. Neff","title_ssm":["1904-048: W. E. Neff vs. Mary E. Neff"],"title_tesim":["1904-048: W. E. Neff vs. Mary E. Neff"],"normalized_title_ssm":["1904-048: W. E. Neff vs. Mary E. Neff"],"component_level_isim":[1],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":8,"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_tesim":["A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n"],"_nest_path_":"/components#7","timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi03752","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi03752.xml","title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes).","There are no restrictions.\n","Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)","Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"," Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n","Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site.","Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n","Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n","Library of Virginia\n","English\n"],"collection_title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"creator_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["These materials came to the Library of Virginia in a transfer of court papers from Lee County in 2009 under accession number 44298."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes)."],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eOrganized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eContext for Record Type:\u003c/emph\u003e Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLocality History:\u003c/emph\u003e Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLost Locality Note:\u003c/emph\u003e Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Historical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n"],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePost-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEncoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":[" Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n"],"relatedmaterial_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eAdditional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"https://www.lva.virginia.gov/public/local/results_all.asp?CountyID=VA149\"\u003e\"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"\u003c/extref\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/lost\"\u003eLost Records Localities Digital Collection\u003c/extref\u003e found at the Library of Virginia web site.\u003c/p\u003e"],"relatedmaterial_heading_ssm":["Related Material\n"],"relatedmaterial_tesim":["Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThese records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the \u003ctitle render=\"italic\"\u003eEmory and Henry Casket\u003c/title\u003e a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLouisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eF. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArdill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/\"\u003eChancery Records Index\u003c/extref\u003e available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n"],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Location\"\u003eLibrary of Virginia\n\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["Library of Virginia\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":10,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c08"}},{"id":"vi_vi03752_c09","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"1906-026: Ardill Fulkerson vs. Minnie Fulkerson","abstract_or_scope":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c09#abstract_or_scope","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":"\u003cp\u003eArdill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child. \u003c/p\u003e","label":"Abstract Or Scope"}},"breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c09#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi03752_c09","ref_ssm":["vi_vi03752_c09"],"id":"vi_vi03752_c09","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssi":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","1906-026: Ardill Fulkerson vs. Minnie Fulkerson","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n"],"title_filing_ssi":"1906-026: Ardill Fulkerson vs. Minnie Fulkerson","title_ssm":["1906-026: Ardill Fulkerson vs. Minnie Fulkerson"],"title_tesim":["1906-026: Ardill Fulkerson vs. Minnie Fulkerson"],"normalized_title_ssm":["1906-026: Ardill Fulkerson vs. Minnie Fulkerson"],"component_level_isim":[1],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":9,"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eArdill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n"],"_nest_path_":"/components#8","timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi03752","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi03752.xml","title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes).","There are no restrictions.\n","Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)","Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"," Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n","Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site.","Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n","Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n","Library of Virginia\n","English\n"],"collection_title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"creator_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["These materials came to the Library of Virginia in a transfer of court papers from Lee County in 2009 under accession number 44298."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes)."],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eOrganized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eContext for Record Type:\u003c/emph\u003e Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLocality History:\u003c/emph\u003e Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLost Locality Note:\u003c/emph\u003e Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Historical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n"],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePost-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEncoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":[" Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n"],"relatedmaterial_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eAdditional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"https://www.lva.virginia.gov/public/local/results_all.asp?CountyID=VA149\"\u003e\"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"\u003c/extref\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/lost\"\u003eLost Records Localities Digital Collection\u003c/extref\u003e found at the Library of Virginia web site.\u003c/p\u003e"],"relatedmaterial_heading_ssm":["Related Material\n"],"relatedmaterial_tesim":["Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThese records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the \u003ctitle render=\"italic\"\u003eEmory and Henry Casket\u003c/title\u003e a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLouisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eF. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArdill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/\"\u003eChancery Records Index\u003c/extref\u003e available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n"],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Location\"\u003eLibrary of Virginia\n\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["Library of Virginia\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":10,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c09"}},{"id":"vi_vi03752_c10","type":"File","attributes":{"title":"1907-045: Elizabeth R. Smith vs. J. K. P. Legg etc.","abstract_or_scope":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c10#abstract_or_scope","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":"\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court. \u003c/p\u003e","label":"Abstract Or Scope"}},"breadcrumbs":{"id":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c10#breadcrumbs","type":"document_value","attributes":{"value":{"ref_ssi":"vi_vi03752_c10","ref_ssm":["vi_vi03752_c10"],"id":"vi_vi03752_c10","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssi":"vi_vi03752","parent_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_ids_ssim":["vi_vi03752"],"parent_unittitles_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"parent_unittitles_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","1907-045: Elizabeth R. Smith vs. J. K. P. Legg etc.","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n"],"title_filing_ssi":"1907-045: Elizabeth R. Smith vs. J. K. P. Legg etc.","title_ssm":["1907-045: Elizabeth R. Smith vs. J. K. P. Legg etc."],"title_tesim":["1907-045: Elizabeth R. Smith vs. J. K. P. Legg etc."],"normalized_title_ssm":["1907-045: Elizabeth R. Smith vs. J. K. P. Legg etc."],"component_level_isim":[1],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"child_component_count_isi":0,"level_ssm":["File"],"level_ssim":["File"],"sort_isi":10,"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n"],"_nest_path_":"/components#9","timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z","collection":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[{"id":"vi_vi03752","ead_ssi":"vi_vi03752","_root_":"vi_vi03752","_nest_parent_":"vi_vi03752","ead_source_url_ssi":"data/lva/vi03752.xml","title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"level_ssm":["collection"],"level_ssim":["Collection"],"normalized_title_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"text":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes).","There are no restrictions.\n","Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)","Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"," Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n","Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site.","Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n","Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n","Library of Virginia\n","English\n"],"collection_title_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"collection_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965"],"repository_ssm":["Library of Virginia"],"repository_ssim":["Library of Virginia"],"creator_ssm":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"creator_ssim":["Lee County (Va.) Circuit Court.\n"],"acqinfo_ssim":["These materials came to the Library of Virginia in a transfer of court papers from Lee County in 2009 under accession number 44298."],"has_online_content_ssim":["false"],"physdesc_tesim":["Digital images; 72.75 cubic feet (160 boxes)."],"accessrestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eThere are no restrictions.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"accessrestrict_heading_ssm":["Access Restrictions\n"],"accessrestrict_tesim":["There are no restrictions.\n"],"arrangement_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eOrganized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)\u003c/p\u003e"],"arrangement_heading_ssm":["Arrangement\n"],"arrangement_tesim":["Organized by case, of which each is assigned a unique index number comprised of the latest year found in case and a sequentially increasing 3-digit number assigned by the processor as cases for that year are found. Arranged chronologically. \n","Arrangement of documents within each folder are as follows: Bill, Answer, and Final Decree (if found.)"],"bioghist_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eContext for Record Type:\u003c/emph\u003e Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLocality History:\u003c/emph\u003e Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cemph render=\"bold\"\u003eLost Locality Note:\u003c/emph\u003e Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"bioghist_heading_ssm":["Historical Information\n"],"bioghist_tesim":["Context for Record Type:  Chancery Causes are cases of equity. According to Black's Law Dictionary they are \"administered according to fairness as contrasted with the strictly formulated rules of common law.\" A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case; however, the judge is basing the decision on findings compiled and documented by Commissioners. Chancery causes are useful when researching local history, genealogical information, and land or estate divisions. They are a valuable source of local, state, social, and legal history and serve as a primary source for understanding a locality's history. Chancery causes document the lived experiences of free and enslaved individuals; women; children; people living with physical disabilities or mental health struggles; people living in poverty; defunct institutions and corporate entities; or those that may not have otherwise left traditional written histories.\n","Locality History:  Lee County was named for Henry \"Light Horse Harry\" Lee, governor of Virginia from 1791 to 1794. It was formed from Russell County in 1792. Part of Scott County was added in 1823. Its area is 438 square miles, and the county seat is Jonesville.\n","Lost Locality Note:  Created in 1792 to take effect on May 13, 1793. A significant number of loose records prior to 1860 are missing, including chancery and judgments. They were probably destroyed when Union forces burned the courthouse in October 1863 during the Civil War. Most volumes including deed books, will books, and order books exist because a local judge removed them from the courthouse for safekeeping before the fire occurred.\n"],"prefercite_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"prefercite_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1857-1965. (Cite style of suit and [chancery index no. if available]). Local Government Records Collection, Lee County Court Records. The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.\n"],"processinfo_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003e Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePost-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEncoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"processinfo_heading_ssm":["Processing Information\n"],"processinfo_tesim":[" Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1912 were processed by Library of Virginia staff in 2011. At this time, there are currently no plans to process and index the 1913-1965 records.","Digital images were generated by Backstage Library Works in 2012 through the Library of Virginia's Circuit Court Records Preservation Program.\n","Post-1912 records were previously described separately under the title Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, 1913-1965. Records are now described together.","Encoded by B. Helms: 2012; updated by J. Taylor: July 2023.\n"],"relatedmaterial_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eAdditional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"https://www.lva.virginia.gov/public/local/results_all.asp?CountyID=VA149\"\u003e\"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"\u003c/extref\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/lost\"\u003eLost Records Localities Digital Collection\u003c/extref\u003e found at the Library of Virginia web site.\u003c/p\u003e"],"relatedmaterial_heading_ssm":["Related Material\n"],"relatedmaterial_tesim":["Additional Lee County Court Records can be found on microfilm at The Library of Virginia web site. Consult  \"A Guide to Virginia County and City Records on Microfilm.\"","Lee County is one of Virginia's Lost Records Localities. Additional Lee County Court Records may be found in the Virginia Lost Records Localities Collection at the Library of Virginia. Search the  Lost Records Localities Digital Collection  found at the Library of Virginia web site."],"scopecontent_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eLee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThese records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the \u003ctitle render=\"italic\"\u003eEmory and Henry Casket\u003c/title\u003e a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLouisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eF. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArdill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"scopecontent_heading_ssm":["Scope and Content\n"],"scopecontent_tesim":["Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes 1857-1965, consists of cases concerning issues of equity brought largely by residents of the county and filed in the circuit court. These cases often involve the following actions: divisions of estates or land, disputes over wills, disputes regarding contracts, debt, divorce, and business disputes. Other less prevalent issues include freedom suits, permissions to sell property, and disputes concerning trespass. Predominant documents found in these chancery causes include bills (documents the plaintiff's complaint), answers (defendant's response to the plaintiff's complaint), decrees (court's decision), depositions, affidavits, correspondence, lists of heirs, deeds, plats, wills, records involving enslaved individuals, business records or vital statistics.\n","The Louisville and Nashville Railroad was one of the premier southeastern railroads, serving fourteen states. In 1886, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company extended the line into Lee County, Va due to the county's proximity to the Virginia coalfields. Due to the increased presence of the railroad, a number of cases post-1886 involve the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company and its impact upon the population and property.","Chancery Causes post-1885 contain a significant number of suits brought by married women seeking their property rights. The cases were either brought by widowed women suing for their dower rights or women who brought property deeded to them by their fathers into the marriage, free from their husband's control. In these cases, the land was usually being used to settle the husband's debts and the women were suing to prevent the land from being sold.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are at this time unprocessed, so have no descriptive information.","These records contain two boxes of “Orphan Chancery” which are unprocessed. These records contain parts, often single items, of chancery causes that could not be further identified as belonging to a certain case.","The defendants were part of the Casket Co. (formerly known as Banner and Index Co.) that published the  Emory and Henry Casket  a newspaper at Emory and Henry College. The newspaper's first volume is included as an exhibit.\n","Mary Pennington, wife of defendant William Pennington, sued to gain control over land gifted to her by her father that was subsequently sold to cover her husband's debts.\n","Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Nimrod Noe. Nimord Noe received payments from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. after a condemnation proceeding, where he claimed the railroad had damaged his property. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. attempted to halt their payments to Noe by claiming that Noe falsely represented the damages and losses done to his property by the railroad. \n","A divorce suit which included a letter from Richard M. Turner to Lilly C. Turner, his wife, describing the other women he had affairs with. \n","F. E. Parsons, the widow of M. C. Parsons, sued her late husband's heirs for her dower rights to lands inherited by her husband. The heirs claimed that the land was conveyed to them before the marriage. In her bill, Parsons accused the heirs of attempting to intimidate her by circulating \"false and scandalous charges\" including accusing her of  having an abortion before the marriage as well as having her and her father arrested for stealing from M. C. Parsons estate. The heirs claimed Parsons, who was approxiamately nineteen at the time of her marriage, only married their sixty year old father to gain ownership to his property.\n","The petition sought a distribution of a settlement given to B. H. Loyd's family after his death in a railroad accident. Loyd was an engineer with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., and a brief description of the accident is included in the suit.\n","A Divorce suit brought by Mollie Monroe against Robert Monroe, her husband after he raped a twelve year old girl in front of Mollie, who was sick in bed with typhoid fever. \n","A divorce suit which included a mutilated photograph of W.E. Neff sent to Mary E. Neff, his wife, by an unknown person.\n","Ardill Fulkerson sued for a divorce from Minnie Fulkerson, his wife and accused her of adultery. The two were African-Americans and a doctor's testimony stated that Minnie had given birth to a white child.  \n","Elizabeth Smith sued for control over a tract of land deeded to her by her father. Samuel L. Smith, her husband, had sold the land to J.K.P. Legg for a set of blacksmith tools. Elizabeth refused to agree to the contract but her husband \"commenced to abuse her and threatened to beat her, and to kill her father B. W. Barker if she did not sign the deed.\" Her bill was dismissed by the court.\n"],"userestrict_html_tesm":["\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the \u003cextref type=\"simple\" href=\"http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/\"\u003eChancery Records Index\u003c/extref\u003e available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eChancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n\u003c/p\u003e"],"userestrict_heading_ssm":["Use Restrictions\n"],"userestrict_tesim":["Chancery Causes 1857-1912, use digital images found on the  Chancery Records Index  available electronically at the website of the Library of Virginia.","Chancery Causes 1913-1965 are unprocessed. Contact Archives Research Services for availability.\n"],"physloc_html_tesm":["\u003cphysloc label=\"Location\"\u003eLibrary of Virginia\n\u003c/physloc\u003e"],"physloc_tesim":["Library of Virginia\n"],"language_ssim":["English\n"],"total_component_count_is":10,"online_item_count_is":0,"component_level_isim":[0],"sort_isi":0,"timestamp":"2026-05-21T11:39:26.690Z"}]}},"label":"Breadcrumbs"}}},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/vi_vi03752_c10"}}],"included":[{"type":"facet","id":"repository_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Repository","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Library of Virginia","value":"Library of Virginia","hits":10},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026f%5Brepository%5D%5B%5D=Library+of+Virginia"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/repository_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File"}},{"type":"facet","id":"collection_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Collection","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","value":"Lee County (Va.) Chancery Causes, \n1857-1965","hits":10},"links":{"remove":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/collection_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File"}},{"type":"facet","id":"level_ssim","attributes":{"label":"Level","items":[{"attributes":{"label":"File","value":"File","hits":10},"links":{"remove":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File"}}]},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog/facet/level_ssim.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"all_fields","attributes":{"label":"All Fields"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026search_field=all_fields"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"keyword","attributes":{"label":"Keyword"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026search_field=keyword"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"name","attributes":{"label":"Name"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026search_field=name"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"place","attributes":{"label":"Place"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026search_field=place"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"subject","attributes":{"label":"Subject"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026search_field=subject"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"title","attributes":{"label":"Title"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026search_field=title"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"container","attributes":{"label":"Container"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026search_field=container"}},{"type":"search_field","id":"identifier","attributes":{"label":"Identifier"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026search_field=identifier"}},{"type":"sort","id":"score desc, title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"relevance"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026sort=score+desc%2C+title_sort+asc"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"date (ascending)"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026sort=date_sort+asc"}},{"type":"sort","id":"date_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"date (descending)"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026sort=date_sort+desc"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"creator (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026sort=creator_sort+asc"}},{"type":"sort","id":"creator_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"creator (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026sort=creator_sort+desc"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort asc","attributes":{"label":"title (A-Z)"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026sort=title_sort+asc"}},{"type":"sort","id":"title_sort desc","attributes":{"label":"title (Z-A)"},"links":{"self":"https://search.arvasarchive.org/catalog.json?f%5Bcollection%5D%5B%5D=Lee+County+%28Va.%29+Chancery+Causes%2C+%0A1857-1965\u0026f%5Blevel%5D%5B%5D=File\u0026sort=title_sort+desc"}}]}